Sample paper

    Sample Letter to the Editor

    To: Junction City Daily Union

    Dear Editor,

    There is a robbery in progress! The students of USD 475 are being robbed! The

    suspects include the State Budget Cuts, but all evidence points to the Board of Education

    and the administrators in this district. The money that should be used to benefit the

    students is in the greedy hands of the administration instead.

    Clearly, Unified School District #475 is going to be affected by the Kansas State

    Budget cuts, along with the rest of the districts in the state. I’m not sure about the other

    districts, but USD 475 may have a simple solution: Reallocation of the budget and a new

    set of administrators and school board members who value children’s education rather

    than nepotism and administrative salaries.

    Junction City’s school district isn’t known for its bright decisions regarding

    funds. A few recent endeavors include the purchase of a brand-new Ford Expedition a

    year or two ago, the move to a different Administrative Building that happens to be in a

    much more lavish location, and the decision to build an enclosed walkway for students

    between the high school and the former Administrative Building, which is to be used for

    more classrooms. These decisions, however foolish, are still not the main cause for a

    budget problem. The administrative costs are to blame. When compared to districts of

    similar size, USD 475 uses dramatically more money simply for administration. Even

    disregarding the percentages, although USD 475 has a smaller budget than 305 (Salina)

    and 383 (Manhattan), it allocates more money for administration (Salina spends

    $3,843,180 of their $68,267,944 budget; Manhattan $3,043,885 of their $47,298,811

    budget, and Junction City $4,142,284 of their $45,743,233 budget). During the 2000-

    2001 school year, USD 475 used 9 of the total budget for administrative costs, while

    Manhattan and Salina seemed to be able to get by with only 6 of their budget being

    used for that reason. They were able to use 50-51 of the total budget for actual

    instruction, while USD 475 was only able to allot 46. This is an outrageous allocation of

    the budget, but the issue doesn’t end there. Both Salina and Manhattan school districts

    are comparable in size to Junction City’s, but it is very difficult to understand why

    Manhattan can get along with 3 central administrators, Salina has 1.2, and Junction City

    claims to require 7.5. It’s no wonder the administrative monetary “needs” are so high, I

    won’t even touch on the issue of a single family dominating the entire district.

    It may appear that the 3 difference in money allotted for administration isn’t all

    that significant. However, when it is put into monetary terms, if the administrative costs

    were cut by 1/3, which puts the percentage of the budget for administration at 6 like

    Salina and Manhattan, there is an additional $1.4 million dollars that could be better

    allocated. That is a large sum of money that would be better spent on children’s

    education, not on the inflated salaries of a large number of administrators.

    As stated earlier, the school district’s budget problems, on the surface, seem to be

    the result of budget cuts and lack of money. The true problem, however, is the

    misallocation of money and the absurd number of administrators in this particular

    district. By simply eliminating the unessential administrators (and in my opinion

    replacing the chief administrators with people that have true devotion to the students

    and the community) and reallocation of the budget, the deficiency of money won’t be

    such a tough issue. Who knows, with the right people writing the budget, we might even

    be able to allot at least 50 of the money for instruction, like everyone else does. Some

    people may argue that it isn’t the misallocation of the money that proves to be the

    problem, that it is the lack of money altogether. I still believe that with the appropriate

    cutbacks in specific areas, particularly administrative costs, the students will be better

    off. The School District is supposed to be teaching the children; let’s put some money

    towards that for a change. All of the information that has been presented can be found

    on the internet on the Kansas State Department of Education webpage. Don’t take my

    word for it; look at the statistics and budget information for yourself. I’m sure it will

    shock and disturb you as much as it did me.

    Sincerely,

    Sally Smith

     

                                                                                                                                      Order Now