Respond to both peer post citing one reference in each response. Only 200 words needed per post. This must be completed by 6:00 PM tonight (eastern time zone).

    Respond to both peer post citing one reference in each response. Only 200 words needed per post. This must be completed by 6:00 PM tonight (eastern time zone).
    Post 1. Marketing sustainability can be somewhat tricky. A company will tend to want to play into a persons conscious in their advertising. For example they may say that they want you to recycle their containers to keep the earth clean for the future. There is also the issue that people tend to think green when it comes to large things like vehicles or large appliances. Often consumers dont think about it when buying toiletries or other small items. Relating to the first issue is that consumers really want to know what is in the purchase for them. When marketing for sustainability it is important to touch on this self-centeredness so to speak. Related is the concept of consumer surplus which is the difference between what one is willing to pay and what one actually must pay to acquire a service or product. (Epstein & Buhovac 2014 p. 147) The idea is that an environmental benefit on top of the benefit received from the actual product or service would be considered a consumer surplus.
    The article I found lists out three benefits that can help a company market sustainability successfully. The first benefit is a functional benefit. This shows what a product or service can physically do for the customer. This includes promises of value for money performance quality efficacy safety or ease of use. (Townsend & Niemtzow 2015) The second benefit is one of emotion. Basically will the product or service make the customer feel better about themselves (eg. smarter or better looking). The third benefit is a social one. Somewhat similar to the emotional one it plays on persons desire to be cool or successful. For example research shows that many Prius drivers are motivated by the idea that driving this car demonstrates that they are modern early-adopters who care about the environment. (Townsend & Niemtzow 2015)
    Epstein M. J. & Buhovac A. R. (2014). Making Sustainability Work. San Fransico CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.
    Townsend S. & Niemtzow E. (2015 March 9). The problem with sustainability marketing? Not enough me me me. Retrieved from The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/behavioural-insights/2015/mar/09/problem-sustainability-marketing-not-enough-me
    Post 2. Marketing the impact of sustainability initiatives can be difficult because companies need differentiate between and balance their marketing between gaining trust for their product and gaining trust for their company. For instance Company A may make a great (well-known) bathroom cleaner one that performs better than most of its competitors. The problem is that Company A pollutes more and makes dishonest business deals that are bad for stakeholders. Company B makes a similar performing product but in a responsible manner that improves the community and the environment. The problem for Company B is that their costs are higher which drives up the price of their product. In this case they must earn the trust that actually are doing good or walking the talk (Ottman & Mallen 2014).
    In the hypothetical example Company Bs challenge is connect personally with consumers to shift their dollars to their product: or perhaps to their cause. To do so a company should be transparent allowing consumers to see their good and their bad. Most sustainable companies provide detailed information about their impact. One that I researched last week was King Arthur Flour in Vermont. The company provides funding and volunteers for community improvements. They implemented food access resources in many communities around the USA and they use sustainable sources for their grains and packaging. They also have a great product which makes marketing easier for them because both their product and their company are desirable choices for consumers.
    Marketing sustainability can also be a Catch 22. Consider Enbridge Inc. which comes in at an impressive 39 on Forbes 2017 of most sustainable companies (Forbes 2017). This is no doubt impressive and Enbridge has accomplished major sustainability milestones that have improved the global community. However if the company touts their accomplishments too loudly they are opening themselves up to continued public onslaught regarding the environmental damage done in their recent major oil spills and the continued controversy in Michigan regarding aging pipelines. From a marketing standpoint they may have to tread more lightly than other companies with a better track record.
    References:
    Kauflin J. (2017). The worlds most sustainable companies. Forbes. Obtained from https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffkauflin/2017/01/17/the-worlds-most-sustainable-companies-2017/#64c353994e9d
    King Arthur Flour Company. (2017). Social responsibility. Retrieved from http://www.kingarthurflour.com/about/social-responsibility.html
    Ottman J. & Mallen D. (2014). 5 green marketing strategies to earn customer trust. GreenBiz. Retrieved from https://www.greenbiz.com/blog/2014/01/14/five-strategies-avoid-taint-greenwash-your-business

                                                                                                                                      Order Now