recovery

Identify issue for change: First you will identify an area in your life where you would like to make positive change. Some people choose to work on substantial issues like anxiety, or depression while others choose issues like weight-loss, quitting smoking or cutting down on alcohol. The important thing is that you identify something that would be meaningful to you but that you wouldn’t usually find time for.
Create a Plan: With the help of your supporters create a Recovery plan to enable you to work towards positive change. .
Write about your experience: In a separate document compare and contrast your experience with that of a mental health consumer, utilising relevant references.

The Task – Part 1.
Groups: Your ability to work collaboratively plays a role in the assessment process however it won’t be assessed. Sometimes people find one or both of their supporters difficult to contact. Should this happen to you it won’t affect your grade, let your lecturer know. In your assignment you can talk about how it made you feel to have poor access to support and compare that to the common consumer experience of not being able to access timely support.
Format of Plan: Be creative in the development and style of your plan. Use a format that works for you – power point, word documents and PDF files are commonly used.
Journal: You will need to keep a detailed journal to refer to while writing Part 2 of the task. It will be important to record;
• how you felt about the support you received each time you interact with supporters
• how your journey is progressing
• what obstacles you encounter
• how you dealt with any obstacles
Checklist – Part 1.
• Aim to record in your journal every day, at least 20 minutes per week.
• Create a personal Recovery plan in collaboration with your supporter/s which is creative, strengths-based and user-friendly.
• In your Recovery plan; clearly identify the issue you wish to work on, what you’re going to do and how you’re going to do it.
• It can also be good to add; factors that will assist you (strengths) and things that might get in your way.
I would like to use giving up smoking and weight loss for this assignment
The Task – Part 2.
In a separate document write an essay in the first-person using your own Recovery experience as the core focus, frequently referring to your perceptions of the consumer experience using; relevant literature and your own insight to support your views. .
Checklist – Part 2.
• Write in an academic style, similar to assessment 1. but in assessment 2, write from a first person perspective.
• Describe your collaboration with your supporter. Discuss aspects of their support that were and weren’t helpful to you and how you negotiated to get the support you needed.
• Compare and contrast your Recovery journey to that of a mental health consumer, using your insight and relevant literature. Take into consideration potential differences in your life situation and social status to that of a consumer.
• Identify and discuss factors that impacted on your ability to be successful – both internal (your own motivation) and external factors (things beyond your control).
• Explore and articulate the importance of consumers as drivers of their own Recovery by comparing to your own experiences and relevant literature.
• Explain how your understanding of the Recovery approach will enable you to provide evidenced based nursing care for consumers. Referring to your personal journey, relevant literature and perceptions of the consumer experience.

Please note:
• Refer to the following marking criteria for more detail on grading.
• On the due date upload your essay and Recovery Plan separately.
• Include a cover page within the essay providing; your name and student number, your lecturer’s name, the name and code of the course and the number and name of the assignment and the referencing system you are using.
• The Recovery plan and reference list are not included in the word limit.
• Those students who were taught Harvard referencing in this program may continue to use it. We are however moving towards APA referencing, click here and choose either the APA or Harvard link for a copy of the guide.
.

Criteria for Assessment 2 NURS12150 – Recovery Mini-Journey
HD D C P F %
Understanding of topic Thorough understanding of relevance of content is clearly evident.
Comprehensive consideration of all aspects of the assigned assessment task.
Clearly demonstrates understanding of how content is relevant.
Broad consideration of most aspects of the assigned assessment task.
Generally demonstrates understanding of how content is relevant.
Adequate consideration of most aspects of the assigned assessment task. Demonstrates limited understanding of how content is relevant.
Content addresses the assigned assessment task. Fails to demonstrate understanding of required content.
Content does not address the assigned assessment task.
30
Use of evidence An expansive range of relevant, contemporary material drawn from various sources used effectively to support the discussion.
No discernible errors in the citation of reference material. A range of relevant contemporary evidence is used to support the discussion.
Minimal (1-2) errors in the citation of reference material. Mostly relevant contemporary evidence is used to support the discussion.
Few (2-3) errors in the citation of reference material. Minimal relevant contemporary evidence used to support the discussion.
Several (>4) errors in the citation of reference material. Poor or absent use of evidence.
Numerous (>8) errors in the citation of reference material. 20
Approach Clear, coherent and convincing approach.
Approach is strong, following a distinctive analytical path from a starting to a concluding point.
Comprehensive and reasoned critical analysis of both concepts and evidence. Clear, coherent approach is presented.
Approach is logical and well developed with each point building on the last.
Reasoned, critical analysis of both concepts and evidence. Clear approach presented.
Approach is logically developed.
Critical analysis of concepts and evidence.

Approach is discernible. Generally demonstrates logical flow.
Attempt at critical analysis evident, although some reliance on descriptive discussion. Approach is poorly developed or absent. No evidence of critical discussion. Paper is largely descriptive. 35
Style and presentation Well-constructed introduction and conclusion that strengthen the overall structure of the paper.
Strong construction of paragraphs with each succinctly discussing a distinct point.
No critical typographical, spelling or grammatical errors.
Adheres to prescribed length. Well-constructed introduction and conclusion that ‘round off’ the paper.
Good construction of paragraphs with each discussing a distinct point.
Minimal (1-2) critical typographical, spelling or grammatical errors.
Adheres to prescribed length. Introductory and concluding paragraphs used with effect.
Construction of paragraphs that aids the flow of the paper.
Few (2-3) critical typographical, spelling or grammatical errors.
Adheres to prescribed length. Introductory and concluding paragraphs discernible.
Basic paragraph construction.
Many (>4) critical typographical, spelling or grammatical errors.
Adheres to prescribed length. No discernible introduction and conclusion.
Poor paragraph construction.
Several (>8) critical typographical, spelling or grammatical errors.
Deviates significantly from prescribed length.

ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!