Now it’s time to write a 1-page minimum individual report on your virtual team activity for Week 4. Answer the

questions below in a Word document. Think back on the decision-making process that you and your team members went

through in deciding the case of "State vs. Scroggs." Do you feel any of you used a rational decision-

making model? As you explain, you might recall that rational decision-making goes through six steps:

1. Define the problem. (Did Scroggs do it or not?)
2. Identify decision criteria, etc.
3. Weight the criteria.
4. Generate alternatives.
5. Rate each alternative on each criterion.
6. Compute the optimal decision.

If no one followed this rational decision-making model exactly, did anyone follow even one of the steps – or some

half way? As you explain, you might consider that you could have been using what we call bounded rationality?

(That’s where you satisfice – that is, you don’t follow such a rigorous model, but rather you seek solutions that

are merely satisfactory.) In bounded rationality, you use some rationality, but you are not completely disciplined

about it. Finally, what about the third approach to decision-making – intuition. How many of you on the team used

some intuition ("gut feelings") in your decision-making process? Explain. (Remember that we often

combine our "gut feelings" with some rational dimension.)

Required APA level one heading is:
Who used What Decision-making Model and the Explanation

This should be an APA 6th edition formatted paper. Your submitted assignment should be a minimum of 1 page of text

(this is not including the title page or reference page).