MSITM6320_ResearchArticleReview_Rubric.xlsx

    0

    Sheet1

    MSITM 6320 AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT – RESEARCH ARTICLE REVIEW RUBRIC
    SNO Criteria Weight Score Excellent Good Fair Below Proficient
    1 Content ofReview 40% In depth analysis of the content (all major points discussed). Excellent summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with a high degree of clarity and insight. Engaging introduction and conclusion, both indicate the overall focus of the paper Points : 40 Comprehensive analysis of the content (most of the major points discussed). Adequate summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with considerable clarity, but lacks insight. Engaging introduction and conclusion, paper focus inconsistently supported. Points : 34 Minimal analysis of the content (some of the major points discussed). Basic summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with little clarity or insight. Introduction and conclusion do not indicate the overall focus of the paper. Points : 28 No content (missed all major points of the content). Incomplete summary. Key ideas/themes/findings are not communicated clearly and/or missed in analysis. There is no clear introduction or conclusion Points : 24
    2 Reflection 30% Demonstrates thorough understanding of the article by listing all key findings and reflecting upon their implications. Points : 30 Demonstrates considerable understanding of the article by listing all of the key findings. Points : 25 Demonstrates some understanding of the article by listing some of the key findings…but documentation is lacking in completeness. Points : 21 Demonstrates little understanding of the article with few or no key findings reported. Points: 18
    3 Organization & Development of Ideas 15% Logical development of ideas through welldeveloped paragraphs, good use of transitions. Points : 15 Logical organization, paragraph development not perfected. Points : 12 Logical organization, paragraphs not fully developed. Points : 10 No evidence of structure or organization. Points: 08
    4 Mechanics 15% Meets length requirement. 1-2 grammatical errors. 1-2 punctuation errors. APA 7 Guidelines are meticulously followed. Adheres to Font/Spacing Guidelines. Points : 15 Length requirement is met with adequate content 3-4 grammatical errors. 3-4 punctuation errors. Adheres consistently to APA 7 guidelines, however, one error present. Adheres to either Font or Spacing Guidelines, but not both. Points : 12 Length requirement is not met; minimal content 5-6 grammatical errors 5-6 punctuation errors Demonstrates little ability to adhere to APA 7 guidelines, more than two errors present Adheres to neither Font nor Spacing Guidelines Points : 10 Length requirement is not met; poor content Numerous grammatical errors (distracting) Numerous punctuation errors APA 7 format is not used Does not adhere to Font/Spacing Guidelines. Points : 08
    TOTAL 100%

                                                                                                                                      Order Now