History should be regarded as a science?

    0


    Evans traces the development of history as a discipline between c. 1960 and 2000. Underlying these changes is the constant fact that history deals with — by definition — what no longer exists and therefore can’t be seen directly. In your opinion, does this fact weaken Carr’s belief that history should be regarded as a science? If so, why? If not, why not?

                                                                                                                                      Order Now