In the first two chapters of your textbook, the authors assert that critical thinking is essential to being effectively human. They discuss the importance of becoming objective in how we evaluate what we see, read or hear; separating ration and emotional responses. Please consider the following in your post (500 word minimum):

What does it mean to be objective? Describe a scenario of an emotional versus rational response to a work of the humanities.

Is it possible to write a history without revisionism or personal interpretation?

What sort of traits do objective discussions possess?

Have you ever encountered a text in one of your classes that you felt was unfair or bias? If so, discuss.

Finally, after reading the entire textbook in this class, what are our your critical responses to it? In what specific ways was the narrative voice bias or fair? Provide 3 specific quotations from the textbook as examples for your conclusion.