Critically analyze 2 different art-historical arguments about this or a related object

    HE BASICS:
    •Choose 1 art object (made between~1955 and the present)
    and provide a close formal analysis of the work.

    Critically analyze 2 different art-historical arguments about this or a
    related object (by the same artist or from the same movement).

    Through synthesis of the above elements, present a clear, original
    THESIS regarding the artwork and texts. (Don’t simply repeat the
    argument of cited sources.)

    The final
    paper should be about 2,500 words, or 9
    -10 double-
    spaced, typed pages, in Times New Roman,12
    -point font.

    The
    bibliography should have at least 5 sources (books and articles).

    The course textbook does not count as a source!

    No web sources
    —i.e., museum websites or blogs—are permitted.
    (Note: library databases
    for peer

    reviewed articles , like JSTOR or Art Full Text, are not considered web sources.)

    The citation
    method should be Chicago Manual of Style (with footnotes):http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html
    .

    Papers are to be submitted in hard copy in
    class on April 3 AND electronically via
    http://turnitin.com
    .
    FURTHER
    TIPS:

    On quoting sources: When you cite an author, be sure to analyze the quote carefully,clarifying how and why it fits into your argument. (Papers littered with quotes and no analysis or synthesis will receive lower grades.)

    Be sure to edit. Points will be deducted for poor grammar and
    awkward writing

                                                                                                                                      Order Now