This means that they worked within their own environment with little interaction across the criminal justice spectrum. There are many reasons for this to include turf issues, security clearances, lack of trust, budget issues, tradition, no interoperable information systems and the lack of a systems approach to problem solving. The events surrounding the 911 incident began to change this and make criminal justice professionals think differently. Criticism and a public demand for effective solutions to security problems in a changing world are also driving the changes. Technology advances are now making it possible to share critical information in ways not even imagined a decade ago. If the criminal justice system is to work effectively, it must truly work as a system. This means there must be collaboration, cooperation, understanding, education, trust and a systems thinking approach to operations and effective problem solving.

State the purpose of the paper
To examine the importance of collaboration in the criminal justice system through an examination of agency interaction pre and post-9/11.
State the stakeholders in the discussion
Agencies and individuals that will be discussed/are major players in the system
i. The public
State the research material for the paper- Your 4 articles
Briefly state the
problems with collaboration pre-9/11
i. consequences of those problems
ii. positive changes in collaboration post-9/11
v. concerns that still need to be addressed before the criminal justice will work as an effective team
I. Body
Article 1
Summarize the main points of the article as they relate to the
problems with collaboration pre-9/11
consequences of those problems
positive changes in collaboration post 9-/11
concerns that still need to be addressed before the criminal justice system will work as an effective team
i. Tell the reader why you picked this article
the authority of the authors, the timeliness of the article, the methodology, etc.
Article 2, 3 and 4 ? repeat for each article
Compare/Contrast
problems with collaboration pre-9/11
Do the articles identify the same issues?
Do they place the same value on the identified problems?
If not, why?
different methodology, different perspective, different stakeholders, etc.
i. consequences of those problems
Which consequences sparked the most rapid change in the system? Why?
Do the articles identify the same consequences?
If not, why?
ii. positive changes in collaboration post 9-/11
What changes have been made?
What is the most significant change?
Do the articles agree on the necessity of these changes/ which changes are most important?
If not, why?
What have been the barriers to change?
How have the stakeholders reacted to change?
v. concerns that still need to be addressed before the criminal justice system will work as an effective team
Do the articles identify the same needs/goals for the future?
Who has the most compelling argument?
Who is responsible (or should be responsible) for executing the changes?

II. Conclusion
Is the system more collaborative that it was pre-9/11?
Who will continue to move this process forward?
What future goal is most important?
How will this goal be met?
Who are the most important stakeholders in the future?
Are they moving toward collaboration or away from it?
Why is it so important to work together?

ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!