Please prepare a half page response for each part:

Part 1

Basically, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) in this case it was passed in order to secure the private medical as well as billing records for patients. An exacting important feature of HIPAA rule pertains to the rights of the patient connected to right to entry as well as management of their records. All entities of the UCSF are counted in order to integrate the HIPAA regulations into their present activities (Anton, 2006).

Typically, HIPAA offers for the meaning and appropriate employ of a personal secured health information or even PHI through the privacy. I think that this statement is only partially true, due to the fact that the patient’s medical records can and should be released to authorized individuals that are involved in the direct care of that patient. In addition, it is pertinent that a patient’s primary care physician transfer these records to other physicians, in a situation where the patient may be utilizing their services for other types of supplementary treatment for their health condition, etc. Due to these factors, the transfer of patient records between authorized and pertinent individuals involved in their health care does not constitute inappropriate usage or release, and therefore constitutes a situation where medical records can be released.

With the healthcare reforms expecting organizations to split PHI with exterior stakeholders through HIEs, portals, EDI, secure messaging, private exchanges along with other means. In other cases, it appears not a private breach or issue if an organization appears HIPAA security obedient hence may demonstrate it (Solomon, 1999). Well, if one appears not, then the person appear subject to inspection and fine through CMS, also are currently open civil liability and accountability.

Part 2

I do not believe medical records are the sole property of the patient and should never be released. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act requires healthcare providers to protect the privacy of a patient’s health information and contains security procedures that must be followed to protect the integrity of a patient’s health information (White, 2014). The information within the medical record is considered the property of the patient, and the patient has an ethical right and complete access to this information. Ownership of patient medical records is also subject to the patient’s right to obtain copies of those records or to have copies transferred to another person.

However, there are some exceptions for releasing patient information to other people. Some states provide for an exception for excusing a refusal to deliver medical records to a patient if it is determined that information in the records could be detrimental to the physical or mental health of the patient, or is likely to cause the patient to harm himself or herself or someone else (Strauss, 2013). The Driver and Vehicle and Licensing Agency is legally responsible for deciding if a person is medically unfit to drive, and needs to know if a driver has a condition, or is undergoing treatment that may now, or in their future, affect that person’s safety as a driver. The driver is legally responsible for informing the DVLA about such a condition or treatment. If a patient refuses to accept the diagnosis or will not inform the DVLA, DVLA may require a person to disclose any relevant information to show that person is medically fit to drive.