Assignment 2: Planning Negotiations
Worth 160 points (Due on July 21st)
You become the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations and the President of the United States advises you that he doesnt want the U.S. to sign a new environmental bill. He feels it will harm well developed nations with a strong economic history and only benefit developing or so-called Third World nations.
Use the Internet to research the U.N. members varying viewpoints on the new environmental bill.
Write a three (3) page paper in which you:
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality logic/organization of the paper and language and writing skills using the following rubric.
Points: 160
Assignment 2: Planning Negotiations
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
Meets Minimum Expectations
60-69% D
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
Weight: 30%
Did not submit or incompletely outlined a plan that includes three (3) types of negotiation approaches covered in Chapter 1-17 for handing he negotiation that will either create a deadlock an impasse or a stalemate.
Partially outlined a plan that includes three (3) types of negotiation approaches covered in Chapters 1-17 for handling the negotiation that will either create a deadlock an impasse or a stalemate.
Satisfactorily outlined a plan that includes three (3) types of negotiation approaches covered in Chapters 1-17 for handling the negotiation that will either create a deadlock an impasse or a stalemate.
Thoroughly outlined a plan that includes three (3) types of negotiation approaches covered in Chapters 1-17 for handling the negotiation that will either create a deadlock an impasse or a stalemate.
Weight: 25%
Did not submit or incompletely compared the United Nations members stances on the new environmental bill.
Insufficiently compared the United Nations members stances on the new environmental bill.
Partially compared the United Nations members stances on the new environmental bill.
Satisfactorily compared the United Nations members stances on the new environmental bill.
Thoroughly compared the United Nations members stances on the new environmental bill.
Did not submit or incompletely examined at least three (3) common stances of opposing U.N. members in which you would need to provide a rebuttal based on your research. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response.
Insufficiently examined at least three (3) common stances of opposing U.N. members in which you would need to provide a rebuttal based on your research. Insufficiently justified your response.
Partially examined at least three (3) common stances of opposing U.N. members in which you would need to provide a rebuttal based on your research. Partially justified your response.
Satisfactorily examined at least three (3) common stances of opposing U.N. members in which you would need to provide a rebuttal based on your research. Satisfactorily justified your response.
Thoroughly examined at least three (3) common stances of opposing U.N. members in which you would need to provide a rebuttal based on your research. Thoroughly justified your response.
4. 3 references
Weight: 5%
No references provided
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
5. Clarity writing mechanics and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%
More than 8 errors present
7-8 errors present
5-6 errors present
3-4 errors present
0-2 errors present