Criteria (Weight) |
Professional (100%) |
Thorough (80%) |
Not Fully Developed (50%) |
Does Not Meet Requirements (0%) |
Professional Format (30%) |
Paper was generally well formatted, although not all specifications were met and/or data included was not properly formatted. Paper is approaching a professional standard. |
Paper had significant formatting issues and/or was missing required information. |
Paper had major formatting issues and/or none of the required specifications were met. |
|
Consideration of the Case Facts (30%) |
All relevant facts in the case were considered in the affiliation decision |
Most relevant facts in the case were considered in the affiliation decision |
Few relevant facts in the case were considered in the affiliation decision |
Did not complete, or missing significant analytical points which were in the case data. |
Decision Rationale (30%) |
The decision rationale was well supported based on the facts in the case. |
The decision rationale was partially supported based on the facts in the case. |
The decision rationale was only barely supported based on the facts in the case. |
No recommendations or incorrect, superficial and not measurable. |
Format (10%) |
Format to given standard, professional language used, no grammatical or spelling errors. |
Format to given standard, professional language used, few grammatical or spelling errors. |
Format not to given standard, unprofessional language used, grammatical or spelling errors. |
JWU1001
College of Online Education
Johnson & Wales University